posted 07-03-2002 02:09         

The so-called Aryans assimilated the already existing culture of the so-called Dravidians and lightened-up so-called Dravidian deities so that they would resemble them (as the Greeks did to Kemetic deities).

The fact that the happenings described in these so-called Vedic writings and the deities in these tales pre-date the so called Aryan presence is made evident by the facts presented in my prior post.

The current light-skinned Indian deities are no more of caucasian origin than the pale-skinned Roman-Greco Isis is of Roman-Greco origin.

A region's deities commonly resemble those whom presently rule the land,if the color of the rulers change then the color of the deities change with them.This is common practice when foreigners take over any land.

In closing:

North Indian deities do not look like Aryans,they look like North Indians.

The fact that these deities don't have blond hair and blue eyes (typical aryan features) proves this point to be true.

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-03-2002 02:25         

Where did the white lab rat come from?

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-03-2002 17:23         

-Where did the white lab rat come from?

Brig, has a question for you, if you think that geography has nothing to do with physical features then, explain from where you think those differences in melanin levels came?

posted 07-04-2002 22:56         

Perhaps you've missed my response to such a question in my last post.

It should be more than evident that I don't plan on going in to detail on this.

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-04-2002 23:01         

No it doesn't.

The Word ARYAN is non-existent in the Vedas.AYRA and ARYAN doesn't mean the same thing (We've been through this already).

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-06-2002 18:39         

Around 40,000 years ago another species of humans appear in Europe called the Cro-Magnons(Homo Sapiens Sapiens) i.e. us. The trouble is our brain size in smaller than Neanderthals also we are comparatively smaller than Neanderthals.

posted 07-07-2002 01:31         

The Sanskrit term ARYA is not a referrence to the so-called White-race.

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-07-2002 01:40         

There is no evidence suggesting that Cro-magnon originated in Europe.

The evidence presents a trail which starts in Africa and ends in Europe (migration).It was in Europe that Cro-Magnons first encountered co-existence with Neanderthals (who were already there for thousands of years).

Also: Cro-Magnons weren't White.

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-07-2002 18:35         

1. Your scientific knowledge is really poor. Just do a search on the web on 'Cro Magnon' and you will see that they first appeared in Europe around 40,000 years ago. Also anatomically they were exactly like the Europeans of Today. As I have already told you there are anatomical differences in all races of humans, so by looking at the anatomy of Cro-Magnons it has been established that they were white.

posted 07-10-2002 02:23         

~1. Your scientific knowledge is really poor. Just do a search on the web on 'Cro Magnon' and you will see that they first appeared in Europe around 40,000 years ago.~

The common so-called scientific position is that Homo sapian sapian (or cro-magnon) migrated out of Africa,to the middle East,to Europe (THE OUT OF AFRICA POSITION).This is no doubt due to the fact that they suddenly appeared in France and Israel and encountered Neantherthals who already lived in these areas.The oldest fossil evidence of modern man was found in Africa not Europe,it dates at 130,000 years old.Mitochondrial evidence also proves that modern man migrated from Africa. This is why the current scientific position it that MODERN MAN migrated out of Africa into the middle east,and then to Europe.
http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigins/ha/sap.htm

~ Also anatomically they were exactly like the Europeans of Today. As I have already told you there are anatomical differences in all races of humans, so by looking at the anatomy of Cro-Magnons it has been established that they were white.~

Oh?
http://www.wilton.k12.ct.us/whs/lib/student_work/website/Allison/Doc1_files/Historical_Record1.html

Also: Because one possess so-called Causcasican features does'nt mean that they're White..

Dravidians aren't white,North and East Africans aren't White,African americans aren't white (we've ben through this already).

~2. Can you name any black Arya(Brahmin) even today?~

Vishnu,Krishna,Kali Amman,Karrupan, Vali Amman,and Parvati were BLACK.

also: The Sanskrit term ARYA is not synonymous with the term BRAHMIN.

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-14-2002 14:03         

Dravidians-Original Caucazoids

Bush Peoples of Africa-Original Mongoloids

Africans (as we now refer to them)-Original Negroids (still the purest humans)

The only answer is Martians came down and interbred with groups of caucasions that had migrated north to Europe. Hence the abnormal biorythm, light eyes, hair and skin of Europeans.

------------------
Know ye not that ye are gods?

Chris

posted 07-15-2002 15:43         

In all it's probability these Manavas were the so called white people, Yakchas were the so called red people, Gandharvas were the yellow people and Kinnaras were the Australoid people.

Rightly or wrongly these people could have been created out of the same existing human group, either by natural selection or may be by some genetic manipulation to fulfil the different types of tasks with optimum efficiency.

The Danavas (Rebel materialistic group among Manavas) had to leave for Europe as they could not meet the expectations of the Devas. The ice and temperature conditions around Himalayas were similar to ice age Europe, so white Danavas could easily settle there. Their color code could have facilitated them in the cold europian climates. These may be the people, we know as Cro Magnyons.

Manavas were mainly for the spiritual, religious purposes. Yakchas (Red) were the warriors, Guards of the Devas, Administrators and the Kings. They occupied India, Cambodia, Laos and Indonesia at that time. Incidently they can still be clearly identified as Dravidians and the Red Indians. Gandharvas (Yellow) people were basically for trades and like the nature of trade they got spread everywhere. The Australoids were basically the master craftmen, and they got marginalised with the fall of ancient civilizations.

Curiously Devas may not be any separate entities, but they were either best specimen of above people or mixture of their peak qualities.

That is why all Devas belong to the same stock but with the different color variants. Ram, Krishna, Vishnu are Indigo Black. Their respective brothers Laxman, Balram and Indra are white. Kubera, Varuna and Maruti are red. Brahma is white. Shiva is white blue, Sati is white, Parvati and Kali are black.

posted 07-22-2002 18:04         

Oh?

~Whether you like it or not, skin color is basically determined by exposure to the sun and general air temperatures.~

The above is a factless statement.

~These changes in melannin levels took a long time to take place.~

How long?

~I know of no other theory (other than the half-baked one about aliens) that can explain the different skin colors.~

So this means it must be true.

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-22-2002 18:12         

And what qualifies this as the only answer?

------------------

Not 1 but 2,not 2 but 3..

posted 07-23-2002 17:47         

Interesting idea, but we have a problem here. You cite Cayce as a reference to bolster your theory, but Cayce himself said that Atlantis was located in the Atlantic-Caribbean area. Here's the exact quote:

quote:

---

3. The position as the continent Atlantis occupied, is that as between the Gulf of Mexico on the one hand - and the Mediterranean upon the other. Evidences of this lost civilization are to be found in the Pyrenees and Morocco on the one hand, British Honduras, Yucatan and America upon the other. There are some protruding portions within this that must have at one time or another been a portion of this great continent. The British West Indies or the Bahamas, and a portion of same that may be seen in the present - if the geological survey would be made in some of these--especially, or notably, in Bimini and in the Gulf Stream through this vicinity, these may be even yet determined. (364-3)

---

posted 07-24-2002 01:56         

Also the earlier Egyptians themselves considered their own ancestors (at least their royal families and the priests) arriving from a sacred sunken island nation they called as "PANT".